|
 Supreme Sanction (1999)
IMDB rating: 4.70
Plot: A newspaper reporter (David Dukes) is marked for assassination for his investigation into what happened to some army helicopters that were mysteriously shot down. However, the assassin (Kristy Swanson) cannot pull the trigger when she sees him with his daughter. She then teams up with him to fight the mercenaries (led by Michael Madsen) that are after him. Ron Perlman is the head of the whole organization behind the master plot.
|
Download Supreme Sanction
Directors: Terlesky John
Actors: Madsen Michael,Dukes David,Perlman Ron,Lister Tommy ‘Tiny’,Sapienza Al,Faison Donald,Teo,Green Dannon,Berg D.J.,Manesh Marshall,Hawn Phil,Action,Adventure,Crime,Thriller,
Why does the OAS and the US insist on returning a deposed tyrant to power in Honduras?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090809/ap_o n_re_la_am_ca/lt_honduras_coup
Former President Zelaya violated the Honduran constitution by going ahead with a planned referendum after it was defeated in Congress…all so he could become President for life a la Hugo Chavez. When Congress and the Supreme Court acted according to the Constitution and ordered the military to remove him from office, passing the presidency to the appropriate legal successor, the OAS (and to his shame Barack Obama) declared it a coup and insisted that he be returned to power.
Honduran troops, like US troops, swear an oath to the Constitution, NOT to the president. They upheld that oath, and now certain supposedly democratic institutions want Honduras to abandon the rule of law and return a despot to power.
In what alternate universe is that something we should sanction, must less demand?
EDIT: The Honduran constitution mandates that all referenda pass Congress before being submitted to the people. When Zelaya’s pet referendum went down in Congress, he elected to go forward with it anyways. That is a direct violation of the Constitution. Congress and the Supreme Court acted appropriately.
OBAMA will only consider his foreign policy successful if the constitutional democracies in Honduras, Mexico, and Columbia are replaced with Hugo-Chavez-aligned Marxist dictatorships.
That is how he defines a successful foreign policy.
Once that is complete, he can focus on us at here at home. (i.e. making us a Marxist Dictatorship).
Ophelia | Aug 09, 2009
You’re confusing 2 separate issues. The issue isn’t about restoring Zelaya to power. Zelaya was the democratically-elected leader of the country. Under the Honduran Constitution, Congress has the power to impeach the president. Had that been done, power would have transitioned to the democratically-elected vice-president. Instead, there was a military coup and they then appointed their own leader.
D.Knows | Aug 09, 2009
He wasn’t deposed, the military right wing coup removed an elected leader who still had the support of his people.
Chavez introduced a bill extending his possible terms, and the PUBLIC VOTED IT DOWN!!!
That’s all this guy was trying to do – put his term limits up for a vote, NOT become a tyrant.
future | Aug 09, 2009